Search for: All records

In various organisms, sequencing of selectively bred lines at apparent selection limits has demonstrated that genetic variation can remain at many loci, implying that evolution at the genetic level may continue even if the population mean phenotype remains constant. We compared selection signatures at generations 22 and 61 of the “High Runner” mouse experiment, which includes 4 replicate lines bred for voluntary wheel-running behavior (HR) and 4 non-selected control (C) lines. Previously, we reported multiple regions of differentiation between the HR and C lines, based on whole-genome sequence data for 10 mice from each line at generation 61, which was >31 generations after selection limits had been reached in all HR lines. Here, we analyzed pooled sequencing data from ~20 mice for each of the 8 lines at generation 22, around when HR lines were reaching limits. Differentiation analyses of allele frequencies at ~4.4 million SNP loci used the regularized T-test and detected 258 differentiated regions with FDR = 0.01. Comparable analyses involving pooling generation 61 individual mouse genotypes into allele frequencies by line produced only 11 such regions, with almost no overlap among the largest and most statistically significant peaks between the two generations. These results implicate a sort of “genetic churn” that continues at loci relevant for running. Simulations indicate that loss of statistical power due to random genetic drift and sampling error are insufficient to explain the differences in selection signatures. The 13 differentiated regions at generation 22 with strict culling measures include 79 genes related to a wide variety of functions. Gene ontology identified pathways related to olfaction and vomeronasal pathways as being overrepresented, consistent with generation 61 analyses, despite those specific regions differing between generations. GenesDsppandRbm24are also identified as potentially explaining known bone and skeletal muscle differences, respectively, between the linetypes. 

Abstract Replicate lines under uniform selection often evolve in different ways. Previously, analyses using whole-genome sequence data for individual mice (Mus musculus) from 4 replicate High Runner lines and 4 nonselected control lines demonstrated genomic regions that have responded consistently to selection for voluntary wheel-running behavior. Here, we ask whether the High Runner lines have evolved differently from each other, even though they reached selection limits at similar levels. We focus on 1 High Runner line (HR3) that became fixed for a mutation at a gene of major effect (Myh4Minimsc) that, in the homozygous condition, causes a 50% reduction in hindlimb muscle mass and many pleiotropic effects. We excluded HR3 from SNP analyses and identified 19 regions not consistently identified in analyses with all 4 lines. Repeating analyses while dropping each of the other High Runner lines identified 12, 8, and 6 such regions. (Of these 45 regions, 37 were unique.) These results suggest that each High Runner line indeed responded to selection somewhat uniquely, but also that HR3 is the most distinct. We then applied 2 additional analytical approaches when dropping HR3 only (based on haplotypes and nonstatistical tests involving fixation patterns). All 3 approaches identified 7 new regions (as compared with analyses using all 4 High Runner lines) that include genes associated with activity levels, dopamine signaling, hippocampus morphology, heart size, and body size, all of which differ between High Runner and control lines. Our results illustrate how multiple solutions and “private” alleles can obscure general signatures of selection involving “public” alleles. 

Abstract House mice from 4 replicate lines selectively bred for 61 generations for voluntary wheel-running behavior were compared with 4 non-selected control lines using multiple genome-wide analytical techniques on both haplotype and single nucleotide polymorphism data...... 

Apes possess two sex chromosomes—the male-specific Y chromosome and the X chromosome, which is present in both males and females. The Y chromosome is crucial for male reproduction, with deletions being linked to infertility¹. The X chromosome is vital for reproduction and cognition². Variation in mating patterns and brain function among apes suggests corresponding differences in their sex chromosomes. However, owing to their repetitive nature and incomplete reference assemblies, ape sex chromosomes have been challenging to study. Here, using the methodology developed for the telomere-to-telomere (T2T) human genome, we produced gapless assemblies of the X and Y chromosomes for five great apes (bonobo (Pan paniscus), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii)) and a lesser ape (the siamang gibbon (Symphalangus syndactylus)), and untangled the intricacies of their evolution. Compared with the X chromosomes, the ape Y chromosomes vary greatly in size and have low alignability and high levels of structural rearrangements—owing to the accumulation of lineage-specific ampliconic regions, palindromes, transposable elements and satellites. Many Y chromosome genes expand in multi-copy families and some evolve under purifying selection. Thus, the Y chromosome exhibits dynamic evolution, whereas the X chromosome is more stable. Mapping short-read sequencing data to these assemblies revealed diversity and selection patterns on sex chromosomes of more than 100 individual great apes. These reference assemblies are expected to inform human evolution and conservation genetics of non-human apes, all of which are endangered species.